- Leica M 262 & Voigtlnder 50/1.2. I use the 1.4 magnifier with my old 90mm tele-elmarit and an external viewfinder with my voigtlander 21mm f1.4 both work just fine for me. The M Typ 240 can record in Full HD at 24, 25 or 30fps. Quite possibly because my camera at the time didnt have it as a feature, I denied that I would ever find it useful. High ISO performance a must wish it was even better. Value for money, incredible quality. Either way, its the M262 that I want to keepif(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_18',188,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1-0'); Though I must admit, this experience has had me thinking that an M10 would be better suited to me now. In fact, I pressed the LV (for live-view) button on the camera before I even took a photo. Ultimately I hope that the dial on the M10 will give me a greater sense of being in control and connected to the ISO settings Im using. Well worth seeking out. But, as someone who shoots, buys and sells a lot of different lenses, the bigger screen would definitely offer me an advantage Id be able to take photos and check lenses were calibrated properly etc. The overall user interface of the Leica M262 turned out to be a bigger upgrade than I expected too though its still not been quite the perfect experience. To me this feels ever so slightly clunky as its also continued to catch me out over the time Ive used the camera. But even this hasnt really bothered me too much it might be a little clumsy what with the need to press 3 buttons when you want to change ISO, but the way the auto ISO works pretty much makes up for it. "MM-P""" Leica M Typ240MM-P Typ240 As I talk about in my M9 review, the screen on that camera really is very crap, so this did feel like a big enough deal to make the jump. With less than full coverage, you may have to crop your photos afterward to get them looking perfect. A M262 is a friendly camera. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Size/weight is perfect . In the setup menu, the most used setting is white balance. Both should arrived this coming week and so I am getting very excited! For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. I find the M262 colours different enough from the M-P I just sold - to my eye the blues, reds, aquas and purples feel denser. My biggest issue in day-to-day use was the control over the ISO, which I find leaves me a little disconnected from what setting Im using. Leica has used the button space on the rear of the camera that is used for live view in the Typ 240 to . The Leica M-D (Typ 262) ($5,995) is the camera for photographers who wish that digital didn't happen. Bluetooth is a wireless technology that allows you to easily transfer data between different devices, such as smartphones, tablets and computers. (and more M ) when I look at results, there is no difference as they share same sensor. The Leica M10-R rangefinder camera has a newly developed 40 megapixel sensor that represents a big increase from the 24 megapixels of the previous M10 model. I wish I did. High quality battery charger is a handy companion for digital shooting. Im still getting used to it, but for me a 2 issues, weight with a big 50mm lens and editing the files you really bring out the image quality as it seems a bit flat to me. I am very pleased to be in a forum withso many helpful people. Otherwise, the two cameras are similar since the 262 is really just a pared-down version of the 240 and if its mainly the rangefinder experience that you are after then you cant go wrong with either. Without looking, apart from the lens detection options, I couldnt tell you whats in the menu at all. Weight savings from the M10 may be there, but with a Thumbs Up in the hot shoe, the M240 feels good and substantial in the hand.ISO setting. Display as a link instead, As such, the Leica M262 is possibly better seen as a sidestep rather than a step forward in the Leica lineup. Didnt have the budget to stretch to a Summilux/Summicron/ Summarit. This includes the M10-R, M10-P, M10 Monochrom, M10, and M10-D from the current generation, as well as the M (Typ 240), M-P (Typ 240), M (Typ 262), M-D (Typ 262) and the M Monochrom (Typ 246) from the prior generation. All features aside, my lust was triggered by the drastic reduction in size. I have an M246 where just holding down the ISO button, turning the thumbwheel to change it then releasing does the job. I was wrong! On the other hand, if you do describe your GAS in terms of Leicas, and suggest a Monochrom is the kind of thing you forget in a cupboard, well. This can be used to capture moving objects using a fast shutter speed, or to take images in low light without using a flash. The last four images you posted are the best images Ive seen from an M240. This screen has very good focus peaking and an exposure waveform overlay that I find invaluable! There is no way to see the chosen ISO until the shot is taken and checking it in the image preview dialogue. I dont need such features on my Leica rangefinders these are real cameras that I use properly, I dont need live-view with my real cameras! So I still have ways to go to become a true minimalist! (Leica M (Typ 262)), Unknown. Ah yes, sorry, of course the screen is actually useful! Ive spent the last month or so shooting with a Leica M [typ 240]. Edward - you are right about the blues and reds. Limited to 75 - 35/28mm. I have a Fuji X100f and stripped down the OVF/EVF data and shoot in manual with manual focus only to give it a M2 feel. p.s. The resolution is given as a compound value, comprised of horizontal and vertical pixels. Oddly though, handling the Leica M262 there is the slightest sense that somethings missing when comparing it to its fuller-featured sibling, the M240. The renderings are quite good as a whole, and this feature is not contained in the M10 which relegates one to only the lens filter option.Card Writing Speed. Funny thing that while the M10 launched, I ordered one early 2017 thinking this may be the M I waited for. Raw files are so named because they are not yet processed and therefore are not ready to be printed or edited with a bitmap graphics editor. You cannot paste images directly. Can you let me know where you heard that the sensor uses different technology? This really piqued my interest. My GAS was satisfied with a Z6 with the M-to-Z adapter. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. Its back to the basics. Of course it didnt. In reality, Ive been saving for this m10 for a long time. I have not seen that anywhere in the promotional material. On the M240 its easy to change ISO by simply pressing the dedicated ISO button and turning the thumb adjustment wheel.The EVF. Changing from color to black and white takes a lot of menu meandering and I wish there was a way to place this setting into a favorites menu as in the M10 (I think). As I don't need money selling them "cheap", I'm happy to keep them all for what they are, using each one equally. The color profile is quite different too, with more electric blues and purer reds. It was at this early stage that I noticed the first thing that has continued to make me scratch my head throughout the time I used the camera. I really enjoyed the m60 when I shot it a few years back, but for practical day-to-day photography, I think a screen suits my digital shooting desires better.And besides, the little flip out thumb-rest?! On 12/27/2020 at 11:24 AM, a.noctilux said: On 12/27/2020 at 12:24 PM, a.noctilux said: Survey: Third-party Lenses for Leica M-Mount , Umfrage: Dritthersteller Objektive fr Leica M-Mount , https://www.overgaard.dk/Leica-M-Type-240-aka-Leica-M10-digital-rangefinder-camera-page-44-Focusing-the-Leica-M-with-Manual-Focus-EVF2-Visoflex-Electronic-Viewfinder.html. The M240 is a bit slow on the uptake, but I generally leave the camera on while on photo walks so not a real issue.Lock-ups. In fact, apart from INFO button/screen which reports battery and SD card information, and the play and delete buttons, the ISO button and the menu it brings up is really the only part of the screen-based interface I use. On same first menus screen can have File Format to pick DNG or DNG+JPG or JPG only.When you get the M10 Ill be interested to hear how you like the B&W jpg vs. your Monochrome. As the cameras are meant to have identical sensors, do we think this is just new owner's biased impressions (nothing wrong with that btw) is could there be something in this? Why poor white balance, plus bad color in JPEG files, for Q2 camera? The Leica M [typ 240] (or M240 for short) was the first Leica to adopt the odd naming convention that broke away from the M# convention of yore. You shouldnt be so hard on yourself, Pera. Usability is great (with some of the limitations you mentioned), and image quality of the 262 is certainly superb, and the main reason (aside from usability and a good sensor), at least for me, the Leica M glass, is a topic somebody else can cover much better than I can. But even then, its not close to other modern cameras. Every other brand talks about new improved this, and added or increased that. Both are great cameras and either would be fine. An electronic viewfinder (EVF) with a higher resolution provides a sharper image, producing a view comparable in quality with the one displayed on an optical viewfinder. Source: DxOMark. More about being to see the settings at a glance, rather than just be able to change them easily. The latter requires the lens to have 6-bit coding or manual setting of the lens in the main menu. Im not loaded, but I do focus almost all my disposable income on this. The Leica M240 has done me proud whilst the M262 has been away, though the experience has not be without a couple of surprises, so I thought Id write a little bit about what Ive found.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_9',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); First off, I should probably say that this isnt going to be a proper review Ive written so many reviews about Leica rangefinder cameras and their subtle differences that the idea of writing my thoughts about every facet of this camera just doesnt appeal at all and thats despite this one having more to offer than any that Ive shot before. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. The image quality of the Leica M240 is outstanding. I have purchased an M262 and, given my budget, a Voigtlander Ultron 35mm (which I have read is actually a really good lens). Shedding some light on the sources of noise, Our favorite gear, rewarded: DPReview Awards 2022, Leica adds 12-bit Cinema 4K Raw video output, improved AF features and more to its SL2-S, A closer look at the Leica M11 (photo gallery), OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro Sample Gallery, Fujifilm X-T5 production sample gallery (DPReview TV), DPReview TV: Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM Review, DPReview TV: Sony 50mm F1.4 GM vs Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG DN Art, The best cameras for family and friends photos in 2022, Best affordable cameras for sports and action in 2022. The sensor is not the same, by the way. I love the M240, didn't feel to switch to the M10. The sensor is not the same, by the way. https://www.dailycameranews.com/, ShakeSphere Portable Blender E-Lid review, Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 Review: A Solid but Unremarkable Upgrade. I then had a feeling that Im sure a lot of people who have too many cameras have once in a while You might know it yourself? The Leica M [typ 262], or M262 for short offers whats best described as a stripped-back user interface. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_17',188,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1-0'); Overall, these changes made the move from the M9 to M262 feel greater than the sum of their parts. Waiting for the fishy in the little dishy by Gil Aegerter, Lava Lizard on Marine Iguana by ZimmWisdom. What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? I use 3rd generation Sony A7 cameras with a cage and a big hand grip with a mic and an Atomos Ninja V external screen bolted to it. For me, theres no place for a comment like Peras. With the M9, just going out for a day I would take two batteries. I did the same thing Hamish, never having handled the M10. That said, the real joy is in how little even the two screens of options in the main menu need to be used. I appreciate your thoughts on the 262 v the 240 as I am thinking about setting an MD body. Without a magnifier piececomfortable view is 50-35mm. But the I needed a 21mm for crowd shots and discovered the live view is awesome for this. Find out more about 35mmc here. From what I gather, skin tones have better rendering with the M10. Its marquee features are omissions rather than additions: the M-D doesn't . We think it rises to the challenge. Really thats been the beauty of the Leica M262 for me for the most part, its done almost exactly what Ive needed it to. As I understand technically m240 is similar to m262 (only some features, but not sensor). Thanks for the insights Louis! They've been even used in a documentary made by a friend of mine. I would have bought a 90 Macro lens if I had live view on the camera even though Ive already got a Nikon with 105 Macro. Some cards are woefully slow. The M262 was not available when I bought my my M240 but if I was buying now I would still go for the M240. I didn't do any critical tests, but I feel the M262 may have around one stop advantage at high iso. but it really did sound like something was missing inside compared to the 240. It was designed and released after the M240 to offer an option to photographers who didnt need the bells and whistles the M240 had to offer. Since most reviews are quite large in content thanks to extensive coverage, comparisons to other cameras and large sample images, they span across multiple pages for easier reading experience. Edit: Since writing this I have been made aware that pressing and holding the ISO button is the quickest way to change ISO. : Leica M240 . The sensor is still not what I would consider great (or even competitive) in regards to dynamic range and high ISO quality, perhaps I was just spoiled by the incredible capabilities of the Nikon Df. Your link has been automatically embedded. Cant quite stretch to the Summicron or Summilux at the moment All the best and, no doubt, I will be on here again soon with myriad questions! If you dont plan to use ur leica more than that range of focal lengths then M262 is right for you. Fortunately, when the image popped up in Lightroom, it was fine or at least it was little different to a photo that I might have expected out of the M262. This happens with the M240 from time to time. Ive turned off the automatic image review and hardly ever needto go through the menu - and for the few times that I do so I appreciate the very simple menu structure so its easy to find what Im after. - and the M240 in color. Im not loaded, but I do focus almost all my disposable income on this. The wider width of the M240 has never bothered me but the new M10 does look good a little slimmed down. The better the dynamic range the system captures a wider number of values from dark to light leading to more details in low and highlights. That breaks the rules by my measure, unfortunately . You can post now and register later. And then I got a Sony A7riii that lets me touch the screen to pick the subject I want the camera to autofocus on! I hadnt noticed that it focused closer though. I know thats not a crime, I also know it has nothing to do with how much skill I have as a photographer. I would say a hidden gem at 2/3 of the price for a used M-10. A timelapse shows a long passage of time sped up. Possibly Leica got the Bayer filter from a different supplier making the change needed. Content contributor - become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog. However it is nice to have a brand new camera and if you can manage without Liveview most M262 users seem very happy with it. Help us by suggesting a value. Nice write-up. The use of a CMOS sensor allowed Leica to include two key features that the previous M9 didnt have. The battery can be recharged and used over again. Ill have to dig out an online manual , I got an 262 you have to press SET after choosing- only with 3 button possiblewith latest software (2021). Live-view brings something extra to a type of camera I had previously (possibly quite stubbornly) felt couldnt be improved. Interesting article as I picked up a used m240 at Christmas at a good price. 3200-10,000 (I find this to be really handy for indoor family photos, which is essentially the only time I need high ISOs) the larger and brighter viewfinder the size (yes, one can really feel a difference) overall operational responsiveness to a much lesser degree: fewer buttons on the back of the camera, smaller red dot, more matte black finish. I completely agree about the thumb rest, adds more (in a bad way) than removing the screen takes away, in my opinion. Id prefer to do this with the Leica as its the camera I use most often and so the battery is always charged with space on a memory card. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. Its been that camera that I know is there and just crack out when it feels right. Since receiving a closer focusing lens though Ive noticed that actually the M10 rangefinder goes down to about 0.58m and the M262 goes to about 0.65m. The only shortcoming relating to the auto ISO function is that sometimes I feel like Id like to be able to see the ISO the camera is choosing on a shot by shot basis. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. With regards to minimizing my digital camera gear, my thinking was simple. The Leica M262 (and M240 or any other current M as of July of 2016) seems more like a bridge between the past and what could be the future of Leica. what a great text, and great pictures, thank you! More humble pie for me! I need a new 50mm lens. Congratulations on your decision. In fact, there was a time when I swore I didnt need anything more. You can click any image for a larger view which is the best way to view it as this site compresses these down to what you see below . I pressed the shutter button to take a photo and was fairly disappointed to see that the image the live-view screen had showed me was now captured as a photo. You'd be wise to buy the best/latest digital body you can afford and leave a healthy budget for the best/most lenses possible. So the M262 is going to stay, and the Leica M240 go. I find it very quick. Clear editor. A raw image file contains minimally processed data from the image sensor. Ive got a 262 and I really like the fact that its completely stripped back to just the basics. There are no 'Landscape', 'Sport', or 'Smile Detection' modes. These were features I wanted to explore whilst I had this camera though I really had very low expectations that they would do much for me. Phase-detection autofocus is much faster than a contrast detection autofocus, allowing for sharper images. The entire camera feels built to last and like a well engineered tool in use. The SET and the ISO buttons are much more useful though to be honest, I personally dont even use the stuff in the set menu either. It was the third major iteration of colour digital Leica M . There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! In the run up to buying an M10 Ive been reading a lot of reviews, and have found the M262 is rarely mentioned in them. I have used many rangefinders, a Leica M8, M9 (and its variants M-E/M9P/MM), M262, M240P and of course most recently the M-D 262. Leica M (Typ 262) The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken. Im not trying to justify myself I certainly wouldnt to trolls the point is simply that I spend my money on something I enjoy. This might sound like a small criticism, and Im sure many wouldnt even notice or care, but actually it goes back to what I was saying earlier about familiarity. Learn how your comment data is processed. The M9 was a simple digital rangefinder with limited features and menu options, the M262 has even less in the menu and a slightly improved user interface. TheLeica M (Typ 262) has a pared-down feature set, an extra quiet shutter unit and a lower price than theM Typ 240. There is still some faint banding, but a huge improvement over the M240. Simple. By Exphotog, A Love Affair With The Leica M-D 262 by Ong Sien Hong - 35mmc, Initial experiments with a Leica M10-P and a Nikon 35mm 2.8 PC Shift Lens - 35mmc, (Mis)adventures with a Minolta Himatic 7s - By Matt Evans, 5 Frames with the new Voigtlander Color-Skopar Vintage Line 21mm f/3.5 By John Scott, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. Got a spare lottery ticket? A simple exterior is my kind of camera- adverts belong on billboards, not on cameras. The Leica M-D Typ 262 was released in 2016 and is already rather difficult to find. And so I had to do a paradoxical thing. As I mentioned in my recent post about the M240, the stripped-back interface was exactly reason . A few years later I sold all my Nikon DLSR kit and switched to Sony full frame A7 cameras and began to realise just how useful it can be. I am including these 2 images taken from the same spot focusing on the same scene. I dont mind adjusting contrast, thats just part of the process of me. The price is$5195/4050. Help us by suggesting a value. The fact that Ive somehow managed to rationalise my way out of that opinion doesnt change how good the M262 really is, and indeed how well suited to me I once felt it to be. And the EVF is a very helpful feature sometime. I like them nice and simple, low tech, etc. Early M3 models featured a double-stroke lever, meaning it required two strokes to advance to the next frame of film and cock the shutter. For compact cameras, a focus motor is usually built-in. homestead high school staff. Image quality is exceptionally good across the native ISO range, the weight has been decreased substantially, and . For me, digital cant create that Portra look, or black and whiteand I really really tried to like the digital Ms, I guess thats where I am different I really enjoy the digital cameras, [] my heart. Upload or insert images from URL. This is particularly useful on long shoots when you need more space. Youve often been a voice of reason in my ear on this website, John. Equally, if I dont find anything particularly bad to say, thats got to be a good thing too, but it doesnt really help in the process of finding things to say. Ive decided to sell my Leica M typ 262, so I thought it about time I write a bit of a post about it. I sometimes shot movies and it was amazing. That said, Ive sometimes found that shooting in high contrast situations the exposure prefers to underexpose slightly, yet have always found the shadows to have plenty enough detail in them when pulled out in post. For example, I have seen an as new M240 from a Leica Store for 2,495 and a Voigtlander Ultron 50mm for c.700. Thankfully with the M10 they've returned to the old system. In fact, I caught myself using it a number of times without thinking. It does make me wonder if they could have slimmed down this body like the M10, were they to have released this camera as a major upgrade rather than a stripped-back sidestep from the M240. Leica M262 M-P M10 M262 Leica M-E . Most of the digital M bodies are going to offer a satisfactory experience for the average first time Leica user. This means the image will be stabilised regardless of what lens is being used. It doesnt even have any way to connect the Atomos to it. So, the obvious question: why not the M10-D? - 35mmc, https://matthewtrader.com/leica-m262-review-after-photographing-my-nieces-5th-birthday-party, Nikon 28ti and 35ti - Mini-Review - By Ahmed Al Shorouqi, 5 frames with the Nikon FM2 & Agfa APX 400 in my Paris - By Martina Rigotti, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. Then out of curiosity, I've bough at fair price ( sh price dropped when M10 came, I couldn't resist) former digital Ms (M240, M-D, M246). Compared to when I shot with any other camera system, my gut feeling is I come away with fewer shotsless spray and pray . But in the context of the fact that functional simplicity is a big part of what attracts people to Leica cameras, its hard not to be impressed by the Leica M262. Selling the M262, a camera that I purchased for its pure simplicity; and keeping the Z6, a camera that I purchased for its many features (including live view, a hybrid camera with fantastic video capabilities including full frame 4K, compatibility with my Profoto strobes, owning quite a bit of Nikon F-mount glass, auto-focus, etc.)! The maximum ISO at which the device still captures excellent quality images. Hello. You and Roger Hicks. Why torture yourself? Im an auto-ISO guy so the dial is nice for the little I use it. I just bought a M262.Its my 3rd Leica M (after a M6 and a M240) and each time I come back to a M, its a delight. The M240 is a great camera that produces gorgeous images but you are undoubtedly going to love the M10. Having live-view is great and the screen is an improvement but its too big for an M and the files look/feel like something that came out of a Sony. I really have found it quite distracting to have an image preview thats different to what Im used to, especially since its both inaccurate and in a way thats unappealing to my tastes. I cant tell you how relieved I was about this I know that probably sounds daft, but my Leica rangefinders are default cameras that I rely on when I want to shoot without any thought to the camera.